The LIE About Obama Being a “Law Professor” Just got Annihilated

Now that Obama is out of office a surmounting number of factual documents reveal that he should have never been qualified for the position to begin with.


During President Obama's presidential campaigns a lot of talk circulated in regards to wether or not he met all the necessary qualifications to run in the first place. Most heavily this conversation incorporated the status of his American citizenship seeing as his Father is from Kenya, but that isn't the only skeleton Obama was attempting to disguise.

Barack Obama staked his political knowledge on the experience of being a constitutional scholar and professor for racial inequality. In reality Obama has never been a professor but merely a lecturer and even that position was acquired through false representation. The University of Chicago only employed Obama as a lecturer under the pretense that he was contracted to write a book about law and race. Although the contract was real, nothing ever came of it because Obama failed to deliver.

As far as having any claim to being a constitutional scholar, Obama lectured during one semester on the constitution and therefore considers himself an expert in that particular field. Throughout his presidency reports circulated revealing that Obama really only bothered to lecture on 3 topics while employed as a ‘professor.'

According to the New York Times, Obama the lecturer taught three subjects only: “race, rights and gender.”

Via American Thinker:

Lie one: Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer. He did not have the qualifications to be a professor. Obama never published a single law paper. He was hired by the University of Chicago when they learned he had been given a book contract on race and law directly after graduating from Harvard. There was no book – just the contract, which he later reneged on.

Lie two: Obama did not specialize in the Constitution. Obama cared about and taught only one subject: race. One course was about race in the Constitution. It is on this flimsy basis that he attempts to pawn himself off as a constitutional scholar.

Lie three: Obama calls himself a constitutional law prof to imply that he loves the Constitution. He is on record – literally, a radio interview done when he was a lecturer – slamming the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution because they never tried to invent a right to “redistribute wealth” – a failing he describes as a “tragedy of the civil rights movement.”

Interesting that Obama believes the wealth should be redistributed by the American government while also collecting $200,000 a year from the government for his presidential retirement allowances that he clearly doesn't need considering his current net worth is about $40 million dollars. Hypocrite.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Scroll to top