American Journal Review | The chickens are finally coming home to roost for Hillary Clinton. Rep Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA) has called on the House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Ed Royce “to approve hearings on alleged corruption involving the Russia and the Clinton Foundation,” according to a press release on the Congressman’s website.
Rohrabacher is particularly keen to see an “under-oath examination of the relationship between the donations and the 2013 CFIUS approval of the sale of America’s uranium reserves.”
Rohrabacher current chairs the House Foreign Affairs Subcommittee on Europe, Eurasia, and Emerging Threats, and has brought forward concerns about Russian financiers contributing significant donations to the Clinton Foundation.
Rohrabacher’s suggestion to Royce cited “new evidence that the Obama Administration had prior knowledge of possible bribery and violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act involving state-owned Russian nuclear industry figures, the Clinton Foundation, and other Americans prior to the CFIUS approval of the uranium transaction.”
Conservatives have often thrown suspicions against the uranium transaction with Russia, which, according to Rohrabacher, transferred as much as 20% of the US uranium reserves to Russia.
Now it looks like we might finally get some answers. It would truly be the height of irony if the Obama administration was the one with links of corruption and collusion with Russia after everything that had been said (and never proved) about President Trump this year.
The media definitely isn’t going to be advertising this awesome new development- that’s why we need to get the word out ourselves by SHARING 30,000 times!
You Might also like
Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee makes a complete fool out of herself as she takes a knee on the house floor, calling the President a “racist” Is this real life?
ROTHSCHILD PUBLICATION PREDICTS SINGLE WORLD CURRENCY WILL BE PUT IN PLACE AS EARLY AS 2018; HELLO NEW WORLD ORDER
The Rothschild-controlled Economist magazine published an article 30 years ago that highlighted the proabability of a world currency by the year 2018.
Thefreethoughtproject.com reports: One must also keep in mind that the controlling interest of The Economist is held by the powerful Rothschild family, who regard themselves as the “custodians of The Economist magazine’s legacy.” In essence, the magazine operates as a quasi-propaganda arm for the Rothschild banking empire and related businesses and, is in many ways, meant to prime the pump of public opinion for the globalist agenda to be implemented.
The excerpt below appeared in the print magazine on January 9, 1988, in Vol. 306, pp 9-10.
Ready for the Phoenix
THIRTY years from now, Americans, Japanese, Europeans, and people in many other rich countries, and some relatively poor ones will probably be paying for their shopping with the same currency. Prices will be quoted not in dollars, yen or D-marks but in, let’s say, the phoenix. The phoenix will be favoured by companies and shoppers because it will be more convenient than today’s national currencies, which by then will seem a quaint cause of much disruption to economic life in the last twentieth century.
At the beginning of 1988 this appears an outlandish prediction. Proposals for eventual monetary union proliferated five and ten years ago, but they hardly envisaged the setbacks of 1987. The governments of the big economies tried to move an inch or two towards a more managed system of exchange rates – a logical preliminary, it might seem, to radical monetary reform. For lack of co-operation in their underlying economic policies they bungled it horribly, and provoked the rise in interest rates that brought on the stock market crash of October. These events have chastened exchange-rate reformers. The market crash taught them that the pretence of policy co-operation can be worse than nothing, and that until real co-operation is feasible (i.e., until governments surrender some economic sovereignty) further attempts to peg currencies will flounder.The New World Economy
The biggest change in the world economy since the early 1970’s is that flows of money have replaced trade in goods as the force that drives exchange rates. as a result of the relentless integration of the world’s financial markets, differences in national economic policies can disturb interest rates (or expectations of future interest rates) only slightly, yet still call forth huge transfers of financial assets from one country to another. These transfers swamp the flow of trade revenues in their effect on the demand and supply for different currencies, and hence in their effect on exchange rates. As telecommunications technology continues to advance, these transactions will be cheaper and faster still. With unco-ordinated economic policies, currencies can get only more volatile.
In all these ways national economic boundaries are slowly dissolving. As the trend continues, the appeal of a currency union across at least the main industrial countries will seem irresistible to everybody except foreign-exchange traders and governments. In the phoenix zone, economic adjustment to shifts in relative prices would happen smoothly and automatically, rather as it does today between different regions within large economies (a brief on pages 74-75 explains how.) The absence of all currency risk would spur trade, investment and employment.
The phoenix zone would impose tight constraints on national governments. There would be no such thing, for instance, as a national monetary policy. The world phoenix supply would be fixed by a new central bank, descended perhaps from the IMF. The world inflation rate – and hence, within narrow margins, each national inflation rate- would be in its charge. Each country could use taxes and public spending to offset temporary falls in demand, but it would have to borrow rather than print money to finance its budget deficit. With no recourse to the inflation tax, governments and their creditors would be forced to judge their borrowing and lending plans more carefully than they do today. This means a big loss of economic sovereignty, but the trends that make the phoenix so appealing are taking that sovereignty away in any case. Even in a world of more-or-less floating exchange rates, individual governments have seen their policy independence checked by an unfriendly outside world.
As the next century approaches, the natural forces that are pushing the world towards economic integration will offer governments a broad choice. They can go with the flow, or they can build barricades. Preparing the way for the phoenix will mean fewer pretended agreements on policy and more real ones. It will mean allowing and then actively promoting the private-sector use of an international money alongside existing national monies. That would let people vote with their wallets for the eventual move to full currency union. The phoenix would probably start as a cocktail of national currencies, just as the Special Drawing Right is today. In time, though, its value against national currencies would cease to matter, because people would choose it for its convenience and the stability of its purchasing power.
The alternative – to preserve policymaking autonomy- would involve a new proliferation of truly draconian controls on trade and capital flows. This course offers governments a splendid time. They could manage exchange-rate movements, deploy monetary and fiscal policy without inhibition, and tackle the resulting bursts of inflation with prices and incomes polices. It is a growth-crippling prospect. Pencil in the phoenix for around 2018, and welcome it when it comes.
Only ten years later, in 1998, The Economist was once again engaging the public in an effort to forward the globalist agenda, with an article entitled “One world, one money.”
Very much in line with the 1988 piece, the publication attempts to explain why a much more centralized and controlled system would be beneficial to the global economy, while wholly ignoring the fact that such a centralized global currency would be a massive coup for the international banking cartel, and the Rothschild banking empire’s financial bottom line.
Additionally, it must be noted that the creation of a global currency would give an inordinate amount of geopolitical capital to unelected international bankers, and subsequently take power away from the citizens of each nation and their respective governmental representatives.
Does anyone really want international bankers to have such a vast amount of political power on top of the massive financial influence and sway they already hold in the halls of power?People want more say in their own lives, not having policy dictated to them by international banksters and bureaucrats.
Control over a nation’s money supply is, for all intents and purposes, the lifeblood of a state’s sovereignty – without this independence, the state only exists in name but is subservient to supranational powers whose interests lie outside of domestic and national political/economic concerns.
“GIVE ME CONTROL OF A NATION’S MONEY SUPPLY, AND I CARE NOT WHO MAKES ITS LAWS,” said Mayer Amschel Rothschild, founder of the Rothschild banking dynasty.
Although the Rothschild family now generally keep a very low public profile, they still have significant business operations across a wide spectrum of sectors. While you may not find any one particular Rothschild on the Forbes’ most rich list, the family is estimated to control $1 trillion dollars in assets across the globe, thus having a strong voice across the geopolitical spectrum that many perceive as a hidden hand manipulating events silently from behind a veil of secrecy and silence.
Are you starting to get the picture?
ELDER PATRIOT – Los Angeles Times headline, Dozens of women and children rescued in human-trafficking sweep in California that nets 474 arrests, is a portent of what’s to come and is likely to eventually ensnare many of those at the highest levels of government.
That is why the Trump administration’s arrest of more than 3,000 pedophiles in the two months since he took office is getting very little coverage elsewhere in the mainstream media.
In comparison, the entire last year of Obama’s presidency only 400 low-level pedophiles were arrested. Investigators working with the Trump administration are determined to put a stop to this heinous behavior regardless of whom it brings down.
On February 24th we reported that, President Trump announced a White House initiative to take legislative action to finally put an end to human trafficking. It was a brilliant move by President Trump and one that will go a long ways towards draining the swamp in Washington.
As more and more traffickers and pedophiles are rounded up some will undoubtedly be looking to make deals to lessen their jail time, which means sooner or later we’ll get to the top of these criminal enterprises that violate the most basic tenets of humanity.
Once President Trump uses his bully pulpit to push for ending these horrendous practices, congressmen and senators will have a very difficult time opposing him. There’s a reason that previous presidents chose to ignore these heinous crimes and congress never demanded them to. We’ll soon find out why.
Trump has enlisted the help of Craig Sawyer a veteran of the Marine Corps and a former Navy SEAL. Sawyer also served with the Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU), and went on to run personal security details for the likes of Donald Rumsfeld, Hillary Clinton, John Negroponte, and John McCain.
According to his website, Sawyer has founded Veterans For Child Rescue “to expose the dark and disgusting world of pedophile trafficking rings.” Sawyers’ is convinced that these rings include members from every level of our society.
Sawyer boasts that, “Our VIPR Team (Veterans Investigating Pedophile Rings) come from the highest levels of Military Special Operations, Federal Law Enforcement, International Counter-Poaching Operations, The Intelligence Community, The Diplomatic Community and Film & Television.” He is working with federal and local law enforcement to help arrest these predators and to liberate the child victims.
This spells bad news for those Washington politicians with something to hide because these men are not whores willing to sell themselves to the highest bidder nor can they be threatened. They just needed a president who would take their back. And, now they have one.
When it comes to the welfare of women and children it’s going to be very difficult for the mainstream media to continue avoiding the D.C. establishment’s role in this scandal.
Finally we have a president who cares about every American. With the Deep State fighting him so fiercely the question arises, “what are they afraid of?”