Haiti ambassador requests official explanation of President Trump's sh**hole comment.
President Trump is well known for his unorthodox behavior and straight forward commentary. Trump tells it like it is, no sugar coating nonsense. Therefore it comes as no surprise that he used the phrase sh**hole while referring to countries such as Haiti and El Salvador. Is that to be taken offensively, probably but the truth hurts don't it?
Pictures of Haiti prove that the term sh**hole is a rather accurate representation wether the ambassador wants to admit it or not. Sure Trump could have put it more eloquently but that's just not Trump.
Haiti’s ambassador to the U.S. on Thursday reportedly condemned President Trump‘s comments referring to the nation as a “shithole” country, which sparked bipartisan backlash.
Ambassador Paul Altidor told NBC News political contributor Yamiche Alcindor that Trump’s remarks were “based on stereotypes” and the president was either “misinformed” or “miseducated.”
An official request explaining what Trump meant is really unnecessary. What he meant is the way your country is being ran has lead to utter devastation due to severe poverty and the resulting effect is comparable to a sh**hole. Your welcome.
You Might also like
- By Manly Man — 1 year ago
ELDER PATRIOT – Who is better qualified to talk about how race has held him back than an eighty-year old black man from the Deep South, Memphis, Tennessee? On his way up there were no affirmative action programs to help him overcome the obstacle of “being born Black in America.”
Morgan Freeman was 80 when he was interviewed on CNN Tonight, two years ago. Host Don Lemon Morgan asked him, “Do you think poverty is part of genetics, to answer your question?”
Freeman answered forthrightly, “No, you can’t say that. I don’t think wealth, personally, I don’t think wealth and genetics have anything to do with each other, actually.”
Freeman elaborated and his answer must’ve had political race hustlers burying their heads, “If you’re born in the U.S., it really doesn’t matter the condition of your birth. What matters is what you inherit from your nurturing, from your environment, whether or not you are — I mean, this is from the standpoint of having been born with little. Here, you can always get out of that. Poverty is just…”
The Academy Award winner wasn’t done.
When Lemon asked him, “Do you think race plays a part in wealth distribution?”
Freeman didn’t hesitate, “Today? No.”
Lemon persisted, “You don’t?”
And, Freeman remained resolute, “No. No, I don’t. You and I, we’re proof. Why would race have anything to do with it? Put your mind to what you want to do and go from there.”
“I was born in Memphis, Tennessee [in 1937],” said Freeman. “I had a long haul from where I came from, to here. But here we are. So proof is in — proof of the pudding is in the eating. Here we sit at the dining table.”
Lemon was desperate to protect “The Legacy Of Liberalism” that has destroyed the Black family and the schools their children attend that Freeman had earlier alluded to (“What matters is what you inherit from your nurturing, from your environment”.)
Lemon: “But it’s hard to — when you say that to people because they say, ‘Here you go with the pull yourself up by the bootstraps thing. You’re just being respectable. Not everybody can do that.”
Freeman’s response was abrupt: “Bullsh**! Everybody can! “Not that it doesn’t – [take] courage. Courage is the key to life itself. A lot of people were born in situations, ‘I’ll never get out of this.’ So they won’t. I say to people who say, ‘Well, I would like to have done so and so and so and so.’
“Well, you could have done it. ‘I couldn’t get out of here.’”
“Man, the bus runs every day.”
Freeman’s message: Certain “truths are self-evident. That all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights,” and abilities and it is up to them what they make of themselves. He warns young people not to be the victim of their own actions. That, after all, is the essence of freedom.
- By Brittany Renshaw — 12 months ago
Now that Obama is out of office a surmounting number of factual documents reveal that he should have never been qualified for the position to begin with.
During President Obama's presidential campaigns a lot of talk circulated in regards to wether or not he met all the necessary qualifications to run in the first place. Most heavily this conversation incorporated the status of his American citizenship seeing as his Father is from Kenya, but that isn't the only skeleton Obama was attempting to disguise.
Barack Obama staked his political knowledge on the experience of being a constitutional scholar and professor for racial inequality. In reality Obama has never been a professor but merely a lecturer and even that position was acquired through false representation. The University of Chicago only employed Obama as a lecturer under the pretense that he was contracted to write a book about law and race. Although the contract was real, nothing ever came of it because Obama failed to deliver.
As far as having any claim to being a constitutional scholar, Obama lectured during one semester on the constitution and therefore considers himself an expert in that particular field. Throughout his presidency reports circulated revealing that Obama really only bothered to lecture on 3 topics while employed as a ‘professor.'
According to the New York Times, Obama the lecturer taught three subjects only: “race, rights and gender.”
Lie one: Obama was never a professor; he was a lecturer. He did not have the qualifications to be a professor. Obama never published a single law paper. He was hired by the University of Chicago when they learned he had been given a book contract on race and law directly after graduating from Harvard. There was no book – just the contract, which he later reneged on.
Lie two: Obama did not specialize in the Constitution. Obama cared about and taught only one subject: race. One course was about race in the Constitution. It is on this flimsy basis that he attempts to pawn himself off as a constitutional scholar.
Lie three: Obama calls himself a constitutional law prof to imply that he loves the Constitution. He is on record – literally, a radio interview done when he was a lecturer – slamming the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution because they never tried to invent a right to “redistribute wealth” – a failing he describes as a “tragedy of the civil rights movement.”
Interesting that Obama believes the wealth should be redistributed by the American government while also collecting $200,000 a year from the government for his presidential retirement allowances that he clearly doesn't need considering his current net worth is about $40 million dollars. Hypocrite.
Tom Brady Overrules Anti-Flag NFL Players, Fires Shot Heard Loud And Clear By Every Military Family In AmericaBy Manly Man — 11 months ago
New England Patriots QB, Tom Brady, showed how being a true patriot happens on and off the field.
With NFL protesting during the national anthem refusing to die out, Tim Brady decided to show his fellow colleagues that not only should one stand for the anthem, but they should honor and respect the men and women fighting for them to have the privilege of playing football for a living while also making way more money than any military personnel could ever dream of receiving. In an epic show of sportsmanship and military respect, Brady and a fellow player invited and paid for the attendance of 200 navy soldiers to come and watch a pro season game from field side. He also honored them by taking the time to go and personally greet and welcome them on his behalf.
Accroding to 27sports, Brady and teammates – active Navy member Joe Cardona, Matthew Slater, and Chris Hogan invited and donated tickets for 200 military members to the big game against Atlanta last night.
Then Brady and Hogan met them on the field and gave them a proper greeting.
— SNF on NBC (@SNFonNBC) October 23, 2017
Meanwhile, on the opposite end of patriotism, you will find the anti American Kneelers who claim to be supporting those who feel oppressed while swearing to mean no disrespect to the military, but at the end of the day, anyone who refuses to stand during the national anthem IS behaving in a disrespectful manner whether they mean to or not.