On Friday night President Trump made an extraordinary move and he declared war on all NFL players who kneel during the presentation of the National Anthem.
The athletes told him to back off. The league told him to back off. The media told. Celebrities told him to back off. But what did he do? He hit back harder!
Early this morning, at the crack of dawn, the President got out of bed, grabbed his trusty phone, and let the world know that NFL fans should STOP going to the games until they respect the flag AND they should fire or suspend anyone who breaks the rule.
If NFL fans refuse to go to games until players stop disrespecting our Flag & Country, you will see change take place fast. Fire or suspend!
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) September 24, 2017
Those are some VERY harsh words from the President, who has never hidden his feelings about athletes kneeling during the national anthem. He has made it clear that protest is fine (just look around the country), but disrespecting those who have given their lives for our great nation to do it is now.
Look, the president is not trying to arrest these athletes. They didn’t break the law. He is also not punishing the teams who defend them since they have EVERY right to do so. He is simply voicing his opinion that it should be taken more seriously.
Just like the President, each and every one of you is entitled to voice that opinion thanks to the First Amendment. So tell us what you think. Should the NFL suspend or fire these athletes or should they be allowed to kneel during the national anthem? Oh, and help spread this everywhere. 😉
You Might also like
Feds: WEINER’S SEIZED LAPTOP Shows Hillary Clinton Covered Up SEX CRIMES With 15 yr old DURING ElectionBy Manly Man — 16 hours ago
Anthony Weiner, the once ambitious New York congressman who spoke passionately for the victims of 9/11, named a champion of the little guys, and don’t forget his much-publicized romance with Hillary’s aid Huma Abedin, had boosted his glamour to the top of the charts.
Now, has quickly become a big public joke that continues to humiliate himself, including everyone else who was hiding behind his dirty secret.
Anthony Weiner has unfortunately become another sick punchline who was caught in a sick perverted scandal with a 15-year-old girl.
Reported by truepundit:
Even as Anthony Weiner’s sexting victim was contemplating suicide, Hillary Clinton who knew about the illicit texting did nothing to intervene to help the girl.
Hillary’s silence allowed Weiner to harass the 15-year-old high school sophomore for another four months.
Fortunately, the girl is recovering from the ordeal and Weiner is on his way to federal prison, have to report today to begin his sentence for tormenting the youth with sexual texts and phone calls.
But investigators who worked the underage child pornography case against Anthony Weiner confirm the laptop seized from the former congressman contained proof that Hillary Clinton knew he was engaging in a long sexual relationship with a minor but did not intervene to alert any state or federal authorities to protect the 15 year old.
Not blowing the whistle on the serial sexter allowed Weiner to keep sexting the youth via cell phone and internet chats for another four more months, law enforcement sources said. While Clinton was busy campaigning to be the first female US president with Weiner’s wife and aide Huma Abedin, he was at home sending the 15-year-old online porn and divulging his rape fantasies to the girl. Weiner also apparently talked on the telephone with the girl, based on intelligence gleaned from the laptop.
Instead of rescuing the minor from a sex-obsessed Weiner, Clinton who was the Democratic presidential candidate at the time and eventual front runner, counseled her long time aide Abedin, to end her relationship with him because bad publicity could harm the campaign. Clinton and Abedin discovered Weiner’s sexting with the minor in April 2016 and that he had already been corresponding with the youth for months.
Neither Clinton nor Abedin apparently did anything to stop the abuse of the minor. Instead, the repeated incidents — which breach a host of state and federal laws — were kept quiet.
Yet Clinton, who champions herself as a women’s rights advocate, did nothing to help the girl. And it gets even worse. Law enforcement sources said the high school sophomore was suffering from depression and told Weiner during over seven months of correspondences that she often wanted to end her life. Weiner did nothing to try to stop the girl from hurting herself.
Neither did Clinton or Abedin.
All the is warehoused on Weiner’s silver Dell Inspiron 15 7000 laptop, which the FBI obtained via search warrant in October 2016, law enforcement sources said..
That means the FBI knew Clinton did nothing to try and stop Weiner from repeatedly sexting a minor during the election. And the FBI likewise has apparently done nothing since the election to charge — or even question — Clinton for what appears to be intentionally endangering a minor entangled in a child pornography case. Ex-FBI Director James Comey previously said his agents combed Weiner’s laptop prior to the election and found no evidence indicating Hillary Clinton had engaged in any criminal conduct. Any. Somehow, Comey and his understudies were able to comb through over approximately 600,000 emails and files on the computer in a mere week. Yet found nothing linking Clinton to the Weiner child pornography case?
That information does not jibe with law enforcement sources. According to their intelligence, there was discussion of charging Clinton with New York statutes for not alerting law enforcement that a minor was being repeatedly exploited. But such talk was ultimately quashed by federal prosecutors who said this was now an FBI and Justice Department case and no charges like that would originate from New York or from local law enforcement where the girl lived.
Former U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara, who presided over the New York probe, kicked the can down the road to avoid implicating Clinton during the election, law enforcement sources said.
It was clear that Clinton was to get a free pass although NYPD said investigators held out some hope she would be charged after the election, especially when she lost. That never happened because she was insulated by Bharara who was jockeying to become the next U.S. Attorney general if Clinton won the White House.
“They (feds) sat on it,” one NYPD source said. “Fucking disgraceful.”
Some of the facts that Abedin, Clinton and the FBI apparently intentionally squelched include:
• Weiner coaxed video chats in which he asked the girl to undress and touch herself and repeat his name out loud.
• The girl told Weiner that she was a sophomore in high school and trying to get a learner’s permit to and learn how to drive.
• Weiner knew the girl was suffering from depression and occasional suicidal thoughts yet urged the youth to dress up in ‘school-girl’ outfits and pressed her to engage in rape fantasies.
• Weiner repeatedly told the high school student that he wanted to force himself on her when her father was out of town and away from the house.
• Weiner forced the girl to write him a letter saying that their online relationship was friendly and at no time did he engage in sexual conversation or innuendo. The youth complied. That letter is on the lap top and in the FBI’s possession, NYPD said. Weiner may have provided a copy to Clinton to cover her in case these allegations exploded during the campaign.
• Weiner used his cell phone to correspond with the girl and the texting apps Confide and Kik as well as desktop Facebook and Skype from the girl’s bedroom while her parents were often asleep in the next room.
• Likewise alarming, and largely due to Abedin and Clinton’s silence, Weiner continued to sext the teenager for approximately four months after Clinton learned of the illegal relationship.
Weiner, who employed the alias of “T-Dog” to correspond with the youth on one texting app, texted the minor after meeting her on Twitter in January 2016. The hundreds of correspondences included exchanging explicit pictures, pornography, sexual texts and video chats as well as telephone calls.
By Manly Man — 5 months ago
One crucial fact has been left out on the reporting of the Trump-Russia dossier.
The crucial fact that CNN has close ties between the network and the opposition research team in the middle of the dossier controversy. Their reporting on the dossier has been extremely favorable to the firm, Fusion GPS, and talked up the dossier’s credibility.
This isn’t the first time Fusion has been described in Senate testimonies as a “smear-for-hire” operation that is misleading and has false media narratives.
All I can see is that CNN is making it very clear that they can not be trusted when they are reporting on Russia.
According to libertywriters:
Days after news broke that Hillary Clinton and the DNC funded the dossier on President Trump, reports reveal that one liberal mainstream network has close ties to Fusion GPS, the firm that composed the document.
What network is that, you ask?
You guessed it. CNN.
Per The Daily Caller, Fusion GPS has apparently been described in numerous Senate testimonies as specializing in manufactured, misleading media narratives against clients’ opposition.
And CNN justice correspondent Evan Perez reportedly keeps close ties to Fusion GPS and its founders.
Check it out:
GLENN SIMPSON, THE FUSION CO-FOUNDER MOST OFTEN ASSOCIATED WITH THE DOSSIER, IS USED TO WORKING ON STORIES WITH PEREZ. AS REPORTERS AT THE [WALL STREET] JOURNAL, PEREZ AND SIMPSON REGULARLY CO-AUTHORED STORIES ON NATIONAL SECURITY.
One of the other co-founders of Fusion, Tom Catan, was also a reporter at the Journal with Simpson and Perez.
And the third co-founder, Peter Fritsch, was their superior as senior national security editor.
In other words, these relationships long precede the media cover-up of democratic connections to the Trump dossier.
In fact, some of the guys can be seen together in photographs on Facebook—at a bar outside Nationals Park in Washington, for example.
And another photo of the group:
Another photo posted by Perez features he and Fritsch on an apparent fishing trip.
Perez, who has reported on the dossier for CNN, has never disclosed his friendships with the founders of the firm.
The Wall Street Journal pointed out all of these connections in a recent editorial:
“AMERICANS DON’T NEED A JUSTICE DEPARTMENT COVERUP ABETTED BY GLENN SIMPSON’S MEDIA BUDDIES.”
Numerous political and media operatives have described Fusion GPS as “highly paid smear experts.”
Thor Halversson, founder of the Human Rights Foundation, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee that he was once a target of a Fusion smear campaign. His colleague, Alek Boyd, shared a similar experience.
“FUSION IS BASICALLY A PEN-FOR-HIRE SHOP, WHOSE OWNERS ARE PREPARED TO CONCOCT COMPLETELY SPURIOUS STORIES THAT ARE FED TO MEDIA CONTACTS DEVELOPED OVER YEARS OF LEGITIMATE WORK IN REPUTABLE OUTLETS,” BOYD TOLD THEDC.
When it comes down to it, though, didn’t we already know this about CNN?
The network can’t be trusted when it comes to Russia coverage, and this is just another bullet on the list of items that proves it.
By Manly Man — 5 months ago
Even liberal lawyers can’t deny that Hillary Clinton is facing legitimate felony charges that present actual ILLEGAL actions.
Democrats have been claiming to remove Trump from office through proof of Russian collusion but as any good constitutional lawyer knows, collusion and collecting information on a political opinion through foreign sources isn’t illegal. However attempting to hide the payment for such actions from the public despite the legal requirement to do so IS illegal, as is receiving a $500,000 payout for the cooperation of approving an absurd sale of 20% of American uranium to the Russian Uranium One company.
President Trump isn’t guilty of any illegal activities that the left can prove, Hillary Vlinton on the other hand is facing a possible 13 felonies all with actual illegal backing to which proof exists.
Fox News’ Gregg Jarrett has identified no fewer than thirteen federal felonies that he believes could be successfully prosecuted against Hillary.
“Thirteen potential crimes committed by Hillary Clinton, she’d be charged for six anti-corruption – they were all felonies. She could also be charged with racketeering for using her charity as a criminal enterprise and then you’ve got all of the email crimes – two of them under the espionage act and two additional.” – Jarrett to Sean Hannity
Jonathan Turley is a Constitutional Law authority whose personal political leanings – it appears that he leans left – never interferes with his legal analysis.
“As you know, I’ve been very skeptical about the past Russian collusion claims as being a criminal matter, even though I supported the appointment of the special counsel after Comey was fired I’ve been cautioning and many others have that it really isn’t a crime to collude. In the same, it wouldn’t be a crime on the Trump side to receive information on the other side from a foreign national.
“The allegations against the Clintons could potentially be criminal. It doesn’t mean that they are criminal. The $500,000 given to Bill Clinton might have been innocent. The timing might just have been horrible. But that would be a cognizable crime if a linkage was found.
“In the same way, the allegation over the dossier does involve a potential violation of federal law. The Federal Election Commission Act requires campaigns to state a purpose for any money spent over about $200, to sort of have an item description for each of those amounts. There isn’t an item description for this law firm for the amount of money that is being alleged to have been given to this research firm.
You know you’re in deep s*** when not even people who side with you can argue that legal actions wouldn’t most definitely be a success because the evidence can’t rationally be argued against.